You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
The rapid electrochemical activation of MoTe2 for the hydrogen evolution reaction
Nature Communications, October 2019
Jessica C. McGlynn, Torben Dankwort, Lorenz Kienle, Nuno A. G. Bandeira, James P. Fraser, Emma K. Gibson, Irene Cascallana-Matías, Katalin Kamarás, Mark D. Symes, Haralampos N. Miras, Alexey Y. Ganin
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||17||57%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||7%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||26||22%|
|Student > Bachelor||10||8%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||9||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,325,299 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
of 51,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 367,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
of 1,457 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,325,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,457 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.