You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Liquid–liquid phase separation morphologies in ultra-white beetle scales and a synthetic equivalent
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Communications Chemistry, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s42004-019-0202-8 |
| Authors |
Stephanie L. Burg, Adam Washington, David M. Coles, Antonino Bianco, Daragh McLoughlin, Oleksandr O. Mykhaylyk, Julie Villanova, Andrew J. C. Dennison, Christopher J. Hill, Pete Vukusic, Scott Doak, Simon J. Martin, Mark Hutchings, Steven R. Parnell, Cvetelin Vasilev, Nigel Clarke, Anthony J. Ryan, Will Furnass, Mike Croucher, Robert M. Dalgliesh, Sylvain Prevost, Rajeev Dattani, Andrew Parker, Richard A. L. Jones, J. Patrick A. Fairclough, Andrew J. Parnell |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 19 | 27% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 19% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 13% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2022.
All research outputs
#634,456
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Communications Chemistry
#35
of 955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,874
of 345,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications Chemistry
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.