↓ Skip to main content

Liquid–liquid phase separation morphologies in ultra-white beetle scales and a synthetic equivalent

Overview of attention for article published in Communications Chemistry, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 734)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Liquid–liquid phase separation morphologies in ultra-white beetle scales and a synthetic equivalent
Published in
Communications Chemistry, August 2019
DOI 10.1038/s42004-019-0202-8
Authors

Stephanie L. Burg, Adam Washington, David M. Coles, Antonino Bianco, Daragh McLoughlin, Oleksandr O. Mykhaylyk, Julie Villanova, Andrew J. C. Dennison, Christopher J. Hill, Pete Vukusic, Scott Doak, Simon J. Martin, Mark Hutchings, Steven R. Parnell, Cvetelin Vasilev, Nigel Clarke, Anthony J. Ryan, Will Furnass, Mike Croucher, Robert M. Dalgliesh, Sylvain Prevost, Rajeev Dattani, Andrew Parker, Richard A. L. Jones, J. Patrick A. Fairclough, Andrew J. Parnell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 27%
Researcher 16 25%
Other 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 16 25%
Chemistry 13 21%
Physics and Astronomy 8 13%
Engineering 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 14 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2022.
All research outputs
#561,642
of 22,465,943 outputs
Outputs from Communications Chemistry
#29
of 734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,926
of 286,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications Chemistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,465,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them